Operant Conditioning (Skinner)
Asked 2 months ago · Viewed 4,365 times
In the context of the theoretical differences between Ivan Pavlov's Classical Conditioning theory and B. F. Skinner's Operant Conditioning theory, which of the following statements is most accurate and scientifically valid?
✓ Correct! Well done.
✗ Not quite — the correct answer is highlighted above.
Detailed Explanation
Classical conditioning, propounded by Ivan Pavlov, is a type of learning in which an association is formed between a conditioned stimulus (CS) and an unconditioned stimulus (UCS), and it is controlled by the stimulus, referred to as the 'S-R' paradigm.
In contrast, B. F. Skinner's operant conditioning emphasizes that the organism acts actively in the environment (Response) and its consequences (Stimulus/Reinforcement) determine its behavior, which is referred to as the 'R-S' paradigm.
Next question →
Which of the following represents the most significant theoretical difference…
← Previous question
Which of the following psychological statements is most…
Related Questions
→
Under the psychology of learning, while closely analyzing Edward Thorndike's 'Primary Laws of Learning' and B.F. Skinner's concept of reinforcement in 'Operant Conditioning', which specific law of Thorndike served as the direct conceptual extension and experimental refinement that later formed the basis of Skinner's 'Schedules of Reinforcement' and response-reaction dynamics?
→
When conducting an in-depth analysis of the philosophical and theoretical nature between Ivan Pavlov's 'Classical Conditioning' and B.F. Skinner's 'Operant Conditioning' in the field of learning, which of the following statements highlights the most important and fundamental difference between these two theories?
→
Upon a deep analysis of the fundamental theoretical and functional assumptions between Ivan Pavlov's 'Classical Conditioning' theory and B.F. Skinner's 'Operant Conditioning' theory, which of the following statements most accurately clarifies the distinction between them?
→
When conducting an in-depth psychological analysis of the role of 'reinforcement' and the nature of stimulus-response among Thorndike's 'Law of Effect', Pavlov's 'Classical Conditioning', and Skinner's 'Operant Conditioning' in the study of learning, which of the following statements most accurately explains the fundamental and functional differences among the three?
→
In the context of B.F. Skinner's 'Operant Conditioning Theory', if unpleasant or aversive stimuli are removed to increase the likelihood of repeating a desired behavior, providing relief or satisfaction to the organism, what is this psychological process and its specific type called?
→
Which of the following is the subtlest and most important logical difference between Edward Thorndike's 'Trial and Error Theory' and B.F. Skinner's 'Operant Conditioning Theory'?
→
Under B. F. Skinner's 'Operant Conditioning Theory', a crucial and central concept is the 'Partial / Intermittent Reinforcement Schedule', defined as a psychological arrangement where reinforcement is provided intermittently after fixed or variable time intervals or responses, rather than after every correct response. Regarding its actual psychological implications, behavioral persistence, resistance to extinction, and the scientific management of intrinsic motivation in students within classroom instruction, which of the following psychological statements is most authentic and scientifically valid?
→
According to B.F. Skinner's Operant Conditioning Theory, reinforcement schedules—which determine whether a desired response is reinforced every time or at fixed/variable intervals or ratios—have specific psychological implications for learning stability, resistance to extinction, and intrinsic motivation in classroom teaching. Which of the following psychological statements is most authentic and scientifically valid?
Log in
to add to quiz, bookmark, or report issues.