Operant Conditioning (Skinner)
Asked 2 months ago · Viewed 3,359 times
Under the theories of learning, a comparative and foundational analysis of Edward Thorndike's 'Trial and Error Theory', Ivan Pavlov's 'Classical Conditioning', and B.F. Skinner's 'Operant Conditioning' reveals that if a learner impacts the environment through independent or voluntary responses without waiting for any mechanical stimulus and strengthens the tendency to repeat the behavior via satisfying consequences or 'reinforcement', which fundamental mechanism of learning does this highlight, and how does it fundamentally differ from Thorndike's and Pavlov's theories?
✓ Correct! Well done.
✗ Not quite — the correct answer is highlighted above.
Detailed Explanation
Detailed Explanation
The correct answer is Option (b).
B.F. Skinner's Operant Conditioning is built upon Edward Thorndike's Law of Effect, where the organism acts actively upon its environment (Response-Stimulus or R-S paradigm).
- Operant Conditioning (Skinner): Emphasizes voluntary responses where behavior is shaped by its consequences (reinforcement).
- Classical Conditioning (Pavlov): Deals with respondent behavior elicited automatically by specific preceding stimuli (Stimulus-Response or S-R paradigm).
- Trial and Error (Thorndike): Focuses on stamping in connections between stimulus and response through pleasant consequences.
Thus, option (b) accurately captures the theoretical distinction regarding voluntary responses and the R-S paradigm.
Next question →
In the theoretical perspective of learning, upon an intensive analysis of the…
← Previous question
Upon an in-depth analysis of Edward Thorndike's…
Related Questions
→
Upon a deep analysis of the philosophical and functional nature of Thorndike's 'Connectionism', Pavlov's 'Classical Conditioning', and Skinner's 'Operant Conditioning' theories, which of the following statements most accurately explains the distinction among them regarding Stimulus-Response (S-R) and Response-Stimulus (R-S) relationships?
→
Considering the comparative and analytical study of Edward Thorndike's 'Law of Effect', Ivan Pavlov's 'Classical Conditioning', and B.F. Skinner's 'Operant Conditioning' within educational psychology: If a learner repeatedly completes homework on time after receiving praise (reinforcement) from the teacher in class, and in Pavlov's experiment, salivation is observed in response to the bell's sound, identify the subtle and fundamental technical difference between these two learning systems (Classical vs. Operant Conditioning) that clarifies the control of Stimulus and Response.
→
Under the theories of learning, after a comparative and deep analysis of Edward Thorndike's 'Connectionism', Ivan Pavlov's 'Classical Conditioning', and B.F. Skinner's 'Operant Conditioning', which of the following statements most accurately clarifies the ontological difference in the stimulus-response (S-R) relationships and their control mechanisms across these three theories?
→
Upon a deep analysis of the philosophical and comparative dynamics of Edward Thorndike's laws of 'Connectionism', Ivan Pavlov's 'Classical Conditioning', and B.F. Skinner's 'Operant Conditioning' in the psychology of learning, if the interrelationships among these three theories are examined in the context of stimulus presentation and response control in an experiment, which of the following scientific conclusions is the most authoritative?
→
Based on a deep comparative analysis of Edward Thorndike's 'Trial and Error Theory', Ivan Pavlov's 'Classical Conditioning', and B.F. Skinner's 'Operant Conditioning' in the field of learning, if an organism performs voluntary responses to affect the environment without waiting for a pre-determined stimulus, and increases or decreases the frequency of that response based on the consequences of its behavior—specifically positive or negative 'reinforcement'—then this process of learning aligns most completely with which of the following theories?
→
Upon a deep analysis of the philosophical and comparative nature of Edward Thorndike's 'Trial and Error Theory', Ivan Pavlov's 'Classical Conditioning', and B.F. Skinner's 'Operant Conditioning' in the field of learning, if an organism impacts the environment through voluntary responses without waiting for a pre-determined stimulus and increases or decreases the frequency of that response based on the consequences of its behavior—especially positive or negative 'reinforcement'—whereas in Pavlov's theory the presence of a stimulus prior to conditioning is mandatory, which of the following statements is scientifically the most authentic and true regarding the fundamental differences and interrelationships of these three theories?
→
Upon a rigorous analysis of Thorndike's 'Law of Readiness', Pavlov's conditioning paradigm, and Skinner's 'Operant Conditioning' within the psychology of learning, if a teacher mentally prepares students for new learning tasks in the classroom and subsequently provides positive reinforcement for their voluntary responses, which of the following statements is most authentic regarding the combined application of these three behaviorist theories?
→
Upon a rigorous comparative and ontological analysis of Edward Thorndike's Connectionism, Ivan Pavlov's Classical Conditioning, and B.F. Skinner's Operant Conditioning within the psychology of learning, if a learner acts upon the environment through voluntary actions without a predetermined stimulus, and the probability of their response increases based on the resulting consequences (reinforcement), which learning theory's fundamental mechanism does this illustrate and how does it differ from S-R theory?
Log in
to add to quiz, bookmark, or report issues.