Thorndike: Trial and Error
Asked 2 months ago · Viewed 37 times
When conducting an in-depth psychological analysis of the primary laws of Edward Thorndike's 'Trial and Error Theory'—specifically the 'Law of Use and Disuse' and the 'Law of Effect'—which of the following statements most accurately demonstrates its fundamental distinction from B.F. Skinner's 'Operant Conditioning' and Ivan Pavlov's 'Classical Conditioning'?
✓ Correct! Well done.
✗ Not quite — the correct answer is highlighted above.
Detailed Explanation
A detailed study of Edward Thorndike's learning theories reveals that his 'Law of Effect' is based on the concept that pleasant outcomes or satisfaction strengthen the bond between the response and the stimulus, which later became the core foundation of B.F. Skinner's 'Operant Conditioning' and the concept of reinforcement. In contrast, Ivan Pavlov's 'Classical Conditioning' operates on a stimulus-stimulus (S-S) correlation where the organism is primarily compelled to react to the conditioned stimulus.
Related Questions
→
Among the primary laws of learning propounded by Edward Thorndike, the 'Law of Effect' emphasizes that satisfying outcomes strengthen a response and dissatisfying outcomes weaken it. While critically examining this law from a psychological and theoretical standpoint in the context of B.F. Skinner's 'Operant Conditioning' and Ivan Pavlov's 'Classical Conditioning', which of the following statements is most analytically correct?
→
In the context of learning theories, while making a detailed micro-analysis of the philosophical, functional, and motivating nature of Edward Thorndike's 'Trial and Error Theory', Ivan Pavlov's 'Classical Conditioning Theory', and B.F. Skinner's 'Operant Conditioning Theory', which of the following statements most accurately defines the real and scientific difference among these three theories?
→
Upon a deep analysis of the philosophical and structural dynamics of Edward Thorndike's 'Connectionism', Ivan Pavlov's 'Classical Conditioning', and B.F. Skinner's 'Operant Conditioning' under the psychology of learning, which of the following statements is most authentic and scientifically true regarding the operational mechanism of Stimulus, Response, and Reinforcement in these three behaviorist theories?
→
Upon a detailed psychological analysis of Thorndike's 'Law of Effect' under Connectionism, Pavlov's 'Stimulus Generalization' in Classical Conditioning, and Skinner's concepts of 'Cumulative Learning' and 'Shaping' in Operant Conditioning, which of the following statements most authentically explains the foundational and functional differences among these theories?
→
Under learning psychology, upon conducting a micro-analytical study of the 'Primary Laws of Learning' proposed by Edward Thorndike — Law of Readiness, Law of Exercise, and Law of Effect — if a teacher immediately praises and rewards a student for giving a correct answer in class, which motivates the student to repeat that response again and again in the future, which law of Thorndike is most active in this situation and what is its main psychological basis?
Log in
to add to quiz, bookmark, or report issues.