Teaching of Environmental Studies (EVS)
Asked 3 months ago · Viewed 2,496 times
Which of the following statements is most appropriate and reflects a scientific approach regarding the use of 'Field Trips' in the teaching-learning process of Environmental Studies (EVS) at the primary level?
✓ Correct! Well done.
✗ Not quite — the correct answer is highlighted above.
Detailed Explanation
Explanation:
Field trips hold immense significance in the teaching-learning of Environmental Studies (EVS). Instead of restricting children to bookish knowledge, it brings them into direct contact with real life and nature.
- Direct Experience: Students gain hands-on experiences by exploring their surroundings.
- Scientific Skills: It fosters observation, inquiry, and critical thinking skills.
- Contextual Understanding: It helps learners better understand their socio-cultural and natural environment.
Therefore, option B is the most appropriate and scientifically sound choice.
Next question →
Which of the following is NOT a primary and logical objective of organizing a…
← Previous question
Why is a 'Field Trip' considered an effective…
Related Questions
→
While clarifying the concepts of 'Environmental Ethics' and 'Sustainable Development' in Environmental Studies (EVS) teaching, who first proposed the 'Gaia Hypothesis', which views the Earth as a self-regulating living super-organism?
→
Which of the following is the most prominent and scientific educational objective of using 'Field Trip' as a pedagogy in the teaching-learning of Environmental Studies (EVS)?
→
Under Environmental Studies (EVS), regarding 'Environmental Pollution and Control', which of the following statements is most appropriate and true regarding the statutory provisions of the 'Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981', powers and functions of CPCB and SPCBs, the inclusion of 'Noise Pollution' through the 1987 amendment, and major air pollutants under NAAQS ($PM_{2.5}$, $PM_{10}$, $NO_2$, $SO_2$, $CO$, $O_3$, $NH_3$, and $Pb$)?
→
In the context of 'Environmental Studies' (EVS), 'Indian Forest Policy', and 'Ecological Balance', according to the biennial report of the Forest Survey of India (FSI), what percentage of Uttar Pradesh's geographical area is covered by forest and tree cover, and how does this status differ from the desired percentage target set by the National Forest Policy (1988)? Furthermore, regarding the ecological, social, and educational implications of social forestry and biodiversity conservation through the 'Joint Forest Management' (JFM) system in the Vindhya and Bundelkhand regions, which of the following statements is most appropriate and true?
→
Which of the following is not a major objective of EVS teaching?
→
According to the National Curriculum Framework (NCF) 2005, what should be the main objective of teaching Environmental Studies at the primary level?
Log in
to add to quiz, bookmark, or report issues.