त्वरित लिंक्स
English Language
1 views
In the context of psycholinguistic theories of Second Language Acquisition (SLA), contrast Noam Chomsky's nativist hypothesis with Stephen Krashen's Monitor Model. Consider the following advanced theoretical propositions:I. Chomsky posits that humans are born with an innate Language Acquisition Device (LAD) containing universal grammar principles, which enables children to effortlessly extract structural rules from impoverished primary linguistic input.II. Krashen's Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis explicitly maintains that conscious language learning (explicit metalinguistic knowledge) can easily convert into subconscious language acquisition (implicit competence) through rigorous mechanical grammar drills and rote memorization.III. The Input Hypothesis (Krashen's $i+1$ formula) argues that language acquisition occurs when learners are exposed to comprehensible input that is slightly beyond their current level of competence, facilitated by contextual clues and a low affective filter.IV. Krashen's Monitor Hypothesis asserts that conscious learning plays a limited role in language production, functioning solely as an 'editor' or monitor to check and repair output only when there is sufficient time, focus on form, and knowledge of the rule.Identify the option that correctly evaluates the pedagogical and psycholinguistic validity of propositions I, II, III, and IV.
✓ Correct! Well done.
✗ Not quite — the correct answer is highlighted above.
Detailed Explanation
Propositions I, III, and IV are correct, while Proposition II is incorrect. According to Stephen Krashen's Monitor Model, 'acquisition' (subconscious process) and 'learning' (conscious process) are completely distinct and independent systems. Krashen's Non-Interface Hypothesis strongly asserts that conscious learning *cannot* turn into subconscious acquisition; explicit metalinguistic rules only serve as an editor or monitor during output production. Chomsky's nativist theory (Proposition I) highlights innate biological programming via the LAD, while Proposition III accurately describes Krashen's $i+1$ comprehensible input principle, and Proposition IV correctly defines the narrow operational limits of the Monitor.
Related Questions
→
In advanced English morphosyntax and voice transformation, converting active clauses into passive voice requires intricate adjustments regarding valency, ditransitive objects, complementation structures, and agentive constraints. Consider the following four advanced propositions regarding active-to-passive voice conversion:
I. When an active clause features a ditransitive verb taking both a direct and an indirect object (e.g., "The board awarded the diligent researcher a prestigious fellowship"), standard English syntax permits two distinct passive formulations depending on which object is promoted to the subject position (e.g., "The diligent researcher was awarded a prestigious fellowship by the board" vs. "A prestigious fellowship was awarded to the diligent researcher by the board").
II. Active clauses containing intransitive verbs of motion, state, or manner (e.g., "The sudden thunderstorm erupted without warning", "She slept soundly for eight hours") can be freely converted into the passive voice by suppressing the intransitive subject and reallocating adverbial adjuncts into agentive positions.
III. When an active clause contains a complex transitive structure with an object complement (e.g., "The committee elected Dr. Henderson chairperson of the linguistic department"), the object complement transforms into a subject complement following the promoted direct object in the passive counterpart (e.g., "Dr. Henderson was elected chairperson of the linguistic department by the committee").
IV. Active clauses featuring middle verbs or stative verbs expressing possession, measure, or resemblance (e.g., "This expansive estate comprises twelve luxurious bedrooms", "The vintage portrait resembles his maternal grandfather") routinely undergo flawless passive transformation in formal discourse (e.g., "Twelve luxurious bedrooms are comprised by this expansive estate").
Identify the option that correctly evaluates the grammatical, syntactic, and semantic validity of propositions I, II, III, and IV according to standard English grammar and Passive voice principles.
→
Transform the following complex direct speech sentence into indirect speech while maintaining precise syntactic shift, backshifting of tenses, and appropriate reporting verbs:The investigative journalist remarked, "Had the regulatory authorities been vigilant when the initial anomalies surfaced last year, this catastrophic corporate collapse could have been averted."Identify the option that correctly represents the indirect narration.
→
Read the following complex sentence containing potential structural, syntactic, and stylistic flaws:"Not only did the research team complete the comprehensive field survey ahead of schedule, but they also discovered a rare subterranean ecosystem within the limestone cavern."Identify the option that provides the most grammatically precise, structurally parallel, and stylistically polished improvement for the sentence, or determine if the original sentence is already correct.
→
In advanced English syntax and determiners usage, the precise distribution of articles (definite, indefinite, and zero) before unique titles, musical instruments, idiomatic expressions, and superlatives presents intricate challenges. Consider the following four advanced propositions regarding the morphosyntactic rules of articles and determiners:I. When a singular countable noun functions in an absolute superlative or unique office sense, such as 'elected president' or 'appointed chairman', the zero article is traditionally omitted after certain transitive verbs, whereas names of oceans, mountain ranges, and well-known musical instruments (when played) mandatorily take the definite article 'the'.II. In idiomatic correlative structures denoting simultaneous proportional increase, the definite article 'the' must precede both comparative clauses (e.g., 'The harder you study, the higher you score'), functioning as an adverbial instrumental determiner rather than a traditional nominal specifier.III. When modifying a singular countable noun with descriptive adjectives where the noun is used in a generic or distributive sense representing a whole class, the indefinite article 'a/an' is strictly required, except when preceded by determiners like 'such', 'what', or 'many' where the indefinite article shifts position to appear immediately after the adjective.IV. Uncountable mass nouns and abstract nouns always take the zero article universally, and even when a restrictive post-modifier (such as a relative clause or prepositional phrase) uniquely specifies the noun, the introduction of the definite article 'the' remains grammatically impermissible.Identify the option that correctly evaluates the pedagogical and linguistic validity of propositions I, II, III, and IV.
→
In the theoretical paradigms of second language acquisition, Noam Chomsky's nativist theory of language acquisition posits the existence of an innate mental faculty termed the Language Acquisition Device (LAD) and universal grammar, whereas Stephen Krashen's Monitor Model outlines five distinct hypotheses. Consider the following four advanced propositions regarding these linguistic and pedagogical theories:
I. Chomsky's nativist hypothesis argues that human children are biologically pre-programmed with universal linguistic principles, enabling them to rapidly induce morphosyntactic structures from impoverished and degenerate primary linguistic input, a phenomenon known as the poverty of the stimulus.
II. Krashen's Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis asserts that 'acquisition' is a subconscious process resulting from natural communication in the target language, whereas 'learning' is a conscious process of knowing about grammar rules, and crucially, explicit learned knowledge can readily transform into subconscious acquired competence over time with sufficient mechanical drill practice.
III. Krashen's Affective Filter Hypothesis posits that emotional variables such as high anxiety, low self-confidence, and strong motivation can act as an adjustable mental screen that prevents incoming comprehensible input from reaching the language acquisition device, whereas a low affective filter facilitates optimal intake.
IV. Krashen's Input Hypothesis (the $i+1$ formula) claims that acquisition occurs when a learner understands language input that contains linguistic structures slightly beyond their current level of competence ($i$), relying on contextual clues, extralinguistic information, and discourse background rather than structural sequencing.
Identify the option that correctly evaluates the theoretical and conceptual validity of propositions I, II, III, and IV according to modern psycholinguistics and Second-language acquisition principles.
Log in
to add to quiz, bookmark, or report issues.