In the advanced evaluation of second language reading comprehension and listening proficiency, assessing higher-order cognitive processing requires moving beyond literal decoding. Consider the following four advanced propositions regarding the evaluation of comprehension and language proficiency across receptive skills: I. Evaluative reading comprehension tasks that require learners to analyze authorial bias, detect rhetorical fallacies, evaluate logical consistency, and critique underlying presuppositions engage critical literacy skills that exceed literal information retrieval and local inferencing. II. In assessing listening proficiency, diagnostic tasks that require top-down processing demand that listeners utilize contextual expectations, pragmatic schemata, and macro-structural cues to construct global meaning, whereas bottom-up processing tasks evaluate the listener's ability to decode fine-grained acoustic signals, phonemic contrasts, and morphosyntactic boundaries. III. Cloze tests and C-tests are psycholinguistic instruments used to measure reading proficiency and overall language redundancy; however, C-tests (where every second letter of every second word is deleted starting from a designated sentence) exclusively evaluate lower-order orthographic recognition without tapping into higher-level textual cohesion or semantic expectancy. IV. In authentic listening and reading assessment, integrative testing formats (such as oral interviews, summarized dictation, or structured information-transfer tasks) are theoretically superior to discrete-point multiple-choice items because they evaluate the examinee's ability to process language holistically within interactive, real-world communicative contexts. Identify the option that correctly evaluates the pedagogical, psycholinguistic, and theoretical validity of propositions I, II, III, and IV according to standard English language testing methodology and Reading comprehension principles.