Operant Conditioning (Skinner)
Asked 2 months ago · Viewed 23 times
When making a subtle analysis of the interrelationships and philosophical differences between Thorndike's 'Trial and Error Theory' and Skinner's 'Operant Conditioning Theory', which of the following statements most scientifically and accurately clarifies the difference regarding the stimulus-response (S-R) framework and the nature of reinforcement?
✓ Correct! Well done.
✗ Not quite — the correct answer is highlighted above.
Detailed Explanation
Thorndike's trial and error theory (in which the Law of Effect is central) is called 'S-type' conditioning because the stimulus holds special significance. Conversely, operant conditioning propounded by B.F. Skinner is called 'R-type' conditioning because the active response of the organism and the subsequent consequence or reinforcement play the most prominent role.
Next question →
While micro-analyzing the substantive and operational differences between…
← Previous question
In the context of the historical development of learning…
Related Questions
→
Among the primary laws of learning propounded by Edward Thorndike, the 'Law of Effect' emphasizes that satisfying outcomes strengthen a response and dissatisfying outcomes weaken it. While critically examining this law from a psychological and theoretical standpoint in the context of B.F. Skinner's 'Operant Conditioning' and Ivan Pavlov's 'Classical Conditioning', which of the following statements is most analytically correct?
→
When conducting an in-depth psychological analysis of the primary laws of Edward Thorndike's 'Trial and Error Theory'—specifically the 'Law of Use and Disuse' and the 'Law of Effect'—which of the following statements most accurately demonstrates its fundamental distinction from B.F. Skinner's 'Operant Conditioning' and Ivan Pavlov's 'Classical Conditioning'?
→
In the context of learning theories, while making a detailed micro-analysis of the philosophical, functional, and motivating nature of Edward Thorndike's 'Trial and Error Theory', Ivan Pavlov's 'Classical Conditioning Theory', and B.F. Skinner's 'Operant Conditioning Theory', which of the following statements most accurately defines the real and scientific difference among these three theories?
→
Upon a deep analysis of the philosophical and structural dynamics of Edward Thorndike's 'Connectionism', Ivan Pavlov's 'Classical Conditioning', and B.F. Skinner's 'Operant Conditioning' under the psychology of learning, which of the following statements is most authentic and scientifically true regarding the operational mechanism of Stimulus, Response, and Reinforcement in these three behaviorist theories?
→
When conducting a detailed analysis of Edward Thorndike's 'Trial and Error Theory' and B.F. Skinner's 'Operant Conditioning Theory' in the psychology of learning, which of the following statements is most appropriate and scientifically true regarding the fundamental and functional differences between Thorndike's Stimulus-Response (S-R) mechanism and Skinner's Response-Stimulus (R-S) mechanism?
→
While micro-analyzing the substantial and experimental nature of the 'Trial and Error Theory' propounded by Edward Thorndike and the 'Operant Conditioning Theory' propounded by B.F. Skinner in the field of learning, which of the following statements most accurately explains the main substantial difference between these two theories?
→
Conducting a nuanced analysis of the philosophical and operational differences among Thorndike's 'Connectionism', Pavlov's 'Classical Conditioning', and Skinner's 'Operant Conditioning' learning theories, which of the following statements most accurately defines the true nature of the Stimulus-Response (S-R) and Response-Stimulus (R-S) mechanisms across these three theories?
Log in
to add to quiz, bookmark, or report issues.