Thorndike: Trial and Error
Asked 2 months ago · Viewed 25 times
Which of the following statements is most appropriate regarding the psychological basis of the 'Law of Readiness' among the 'Primary Laws of Learning' propounded by Edward Thorndike and its essential implications for classroom teaching?
✓ Correct! Well done.
✗ Not quite — the correct answer is highlighted above.
Detailed Explanation
Understanding the Law of Readiness
Among Thorndike's primary laws of learning, the 'Law of Readiness' is closely associated with neuromuscular preparation. According to this law:
- When a learner is mentally and physically prepared to perform an action, performing it brings satisfaction, leading to effective learning.
- Conversely, if the learner is not ready and is forced to learn, it results in annoyance or dissatisfaction.
For further reference, you may consult academic resources on educational psychology.
Next question →
While conducting an in-depth analysis of the primary and secondary laws of…
← Previous question
Which of the following most accurately explains the actual…
Related Questions
→
Among the primary laws of learning propounded by Edward Thorndike, the 'Law of Effect' emphasizes that satisfying outcomes strengthen a response and dissatisfying outcomes weaken it. While critically examining this law from a psychological and theoretical standpoint in the context of B.F. Skinner's 'Operant Conditioning' and Ivan Pavlov's 'Classical Conditioning', which of the following statements is most analytically correct?
→
Who proposed the Multi-factor theory of intelligence?
→
Who is considered the father of educational psychology?
→
What does Thorndike's 'Law of Readiness' in learning mean?
→
When making a comparative analysis of Edward Thorndike's 'Trial and Error Theory' and Ivan Pavlov's 'Classical Conditioning Theory' in the field of learning, which of the following statements most accurately highlights the fundamental and core difference between these two theories?
→
When performing a subtle psychological analysis of the theoretical and functional differences between Thorndike's subsidiary laws of the Trial and Error Theory—specifically the 'Law of Multiple Response' and the 'Law of Associative Shifting'—and Edwin Guthrie's 'Contiguity Theory of Learning', which of the following statements most authentically clarifies the true nature of these theories and the learning process?
→
When conducting a philosophical and pedagogical analysis of the 'Law of Use and Disuse' (Law of Exercise) and the 'Law of Effect' within Edward Thorndike's 'Trial and Error Theory' of learning, which of the following statements most accurately defines the scientific nature and classroom utility of these laws?
→
What is the primary and philosophical difference between Edward Thorndike's Trial and Error Theory and Ivan Pavlov's Classical Conditioning Theory in the context of the learning process?
Log in
to add to quiz, bookmark, or report issues.