Thorndike: Trial and Error
Asked 3 weeks ago · Viewed 1,451 times
Under Edward Thorndike's Connectionism Theory, the Law of Effect is defined as a psychological process where the strength of a stimulus-response (S-R) bond increases if followed by a satisfying state, and weakens if followed by an annoying state. Regarding its psychological implications and scientific management of student motivation, reinforcement, and meaningful learning in classroom teaching, which of the following psychological statements is most authentic and scientifically valid?
✓ Correct! Well done.
✗ Not quite — the correct answer is highlighted above.
Detailed Explanation
In Edward Thorndike's Connectionism Theory, the Law of Effect is a fundamental and central principle of learning. According to this law, actions or responses that yield satisfying outcomes (success, praise, pleasant feelings) are strengthened in the mind, while those with annoying outcomes are weakened.
Key Implications in Classroom Teaching:
- Positive Reinforcement: Satisfying experiences act as natural reinforcers, encouraging students to repeat desired behaviors.
- Student Motivation: Pleasant outcomes foster intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, enhancing active engagement.
- Learning Environment: Creating a satisfying learning atmosphere promotes long-term retention and conceptual clarity.
Therefore, option B accurately describes its scientific role in modern pedagogy.
Next question →
Under Edward Thorndike's Theory of Learning, 'Law of Effect' is a central rule…
← Previous question
Under Edward Thorndike's Trial and Error Theory of…
Related Questions
→
Upon an in-depth analysis of Edward Thorndike's 'Connectionism', Ivan Pavlov's 'Classical Conditioning', and B.F. Skinner's 'Operant Conditioning' in the psychology of learning, if a learner impacts the environment through voluntary actions without any predetermined mechanical stimulus, and the probability of their response increases based on the received consequences or positive reinforcement, which fundamental mechanism of learning does this demonstrate and how is it fundamentally different from Pavlov's classical conditioning?
→
Under the theories of learning, a comparative and foundational analysis of Edward Thorndike's 'Trial and Error Theory', Ivan Pavlov's 'Classical Conditioning', and B.F. Skinner's 'Operant Conditioning' reveals that if a learner impacts the environment through independent or voluntary responses without waiting for any mechanical stimulus and strengthens the tendency to repeat the behavior via satisfying consequences or 'reinforcement', which fundamental mechanism of learning does this highlight, and how does it fundamentally differ from Thorndike's and Pavlov's theories?
→
Upon a rigorous comparative and ontological analysis of Edward Thorndike's Connectionism, Ivan Pavlov's Classical Conditioning, and B.F. Skinner's Operant Conditioning within the psychology of learning, if a learner acts upon the environment through voluntary actions without a predetermined stimulus, and the probability of their response increases based on the resulting consequences (reinforcement), which learning theory's fundamental mechanism does this illustrate and how does it differ from S-R theory?
→
An important theoretical difference between Thorndike's Trial and Error Theory and Skinner's Operant Conditioning is that Thorndike's theory is based on 'S-R Theory' (Stimulus-Response), whereas Skinner's theory focuses on 'R-S Theory' (Response-Stimulus). In this context, which of the following statements is most accurate regarding Skinner's theory?
→
Under Edward Thorndike's Connectionism Theory, a central rule—the 'Law of Effect'—states that responses followed by satisfying or pleasant outcomes strengthen the stimulus-response (S-R) bond, while those followed by unpleasant outcomes weaken it. Regarding its psychological implications and scientific management of student motivation, reinforcement, and satisfying learning experiences in classroom teaching, which of the following psychological statements is most authentic and scientifically valid?
→
Under Edward Thorndike's Connectionism Theory, the 'Law of Effect' is a central rule defined as a psychological process where a response followed by a satisfying or pleasant outcome strengthens the Stimulus-Response (S-R) bond, while an unsatisfying or painful outcome weakens it. Regarding its psychological implications and scientific management of student motivation, reinforcement, and learning effectiveness in classroom teaching, which of the following psychological statements is most authentic and scientifically valid?
→
Which of the following psychological statements is most authentic and scientifically valid regarding the real psychological implications of Edward Thorndike's 'Trial and Error Theory of Learning'—specifically its central rule, the 'Law of Readiness', defined as the psychological state where when a neural pathway is fully prepared to act and is allowed to do so, it gives a feeling of pleasure or satisfaction, and vice versa leads to annoyance or dissatisfaction—and its scientific operation in classroom teaching for student motivation, mental preparation, and learning effectiveness?
→
Under Edward Thorndike's Connectionism Theory, the 'Law of Effect' is a central rule defining that if a response is followed by a satisfying or pleasurable consequence, the stimulus-response (S-R) bond is strengthened, and if it is followed by an annoying consequence, the bond is weakened. Regarding its psychological implications, reinforcement, motivation, and error correction in classroom teaching, which of the following statements is most authentic and scientifically valid?
Log in
to add to quiz, bookmark, or report issues.