Operant Conditioning (Skinner)
Asked 3 months ago · Viewed 1,314 times
Which of the following psychological statements is most authentic and scientifically valid regarding the true psychological implications of the concept of 'Positive and Negative Reinforcement'—conceptualized under B. F. Skinner's Operant Conditioning Theory, where positive reinforcement increases the frequency of a response by presenting a pleasant stimulus after a desired behavior, while negative reinforcement strengthens the likelihood of the same response by removing or liberating from an unpleasant or punitive situation—and its scientific operation regarding students' adaptive behavior, internal discipline, and learning curve in classroom teaching?
✓ Correct! Well done.
✗ Not quite — the correct answer is highlighted above.
Detailed Explanation
According to B. F. Skinner's operant conditioning theory, 'Negative Reinforcement' increases the frequency or probability of a desired behavior by removing (or avoiding) an unpleasant or distressing stimulus. This is entirely different from 'Punishment'; while the purpose of punishment is to weaken or stop an unwanted behavior, negative reinforcement strengthens the probability of a correct or desired response. In a classroom context, teachers can effectively use negative reinforcement by exempting students from an unpleasant condition (such as extra practice or oral questioning) upon completing homework.
Next question →
Under B. F. Skinner's Operant Conditioning Theory, the concept of…
← Previous question
Regarding Norman Crowder's concept of 'Branching…
Related Questions
→
Under the psychology of learning, while closely analyzing Edward Thorndike's 'Primary Laws of Learning' and B.F. Skinner's concept of reinforcement in 'Operant Conditioning', which specific law of Thorndike served as the direct conceptual extension and experimental refinement that later formed the basis of Skinner's 'Schedules of Reinforcement' and response-reaction dynamics?
→
When conducting an in-depth analysis of the philosophical and theoretical nature between Ivan Pavlov's 'Classical Conditioning' and B.F. Skinner's 'Operant Conditioning' in the field of learning, which of the following statements highlights the most important and fundamental difference between these two theories?
→
Upon a deep analysis of the fundamental theoretical and functional assumptions between Ivan Pavlov's 'Classical Conditioning' theory and B.F. Skinner's 'Operant Conditioning' theory, which of the following statements most accurately clarifies the distinction between them?
→
When conducting an in-depth psychological analysis of the role of 'reinforcement' and the nature of stimulus-response among Thorndike's 'Law of Effect', Pavlov's 'Classical Conditioning', and Skinner's 'Operant Conditioning' in the study of learning, which of the following statements most accurately explains the fundamental and functional differences among the three?
→
According to B. F. Skinner's 'Operant Conditioning Theory', the concept of 'Shaping' (successive approximation method)—under which an organism's successive and proximate approximations are continuously provided with positive reinforcement to acquire a complex, desired, and novel behavior until the final target behavior is fully exhibited—has specific psychological implications for classroom teaching. Which of the following psychological statements is most authentic and scientifically valid regarding the scientific management of student skill development, remedial teaching, and behavior modification?
→
Under B. F. Skinner's Operant Conditioning Theory, the concept of 'Shaping' utilizes the method of successive approximations to acquire a complex or new desired behavior, where reinforcement is provided for each small improved step or behavioral component to reach the ultimate goal. Regarding its actual psychological implications and the scientific management of complex skill acquisition, step-by-step behavior modification, and reinforcement schedules for students in classroom teaching, which of the following psychological statements is most authentic and scientifically valid?
→
Under B. F. Skinner's Operant Conditioning Theory, the concept of 'Shaping' or the 'Successive Approximation Method'—whereby instead of directly achieving a complex, new, or initially absent desired behavior, the individual steps or behaviors moving toward the ultimate goal are progressively molded through reinforcement—what is the most authentic and scientifically valid psychological statement regarding its real psychological implications and the scientific construction of new practical skills and complex habits for students in classroom teaching?
→
Under B.F. Skinner's Operant Conditioning Theory, the concept of 'Shaping', which utilizes the 'Method of Successive Approximations' to progressively acquire a complex, desired, or novel behavior by providing reinforcement for correct responses at each step, has significant psychological implications for classroom teaching. Regarding the scientific management of acquiring difficult student skills, step-by-step progress, and positive behavior modification, which of the following psychological statements is most authentic and scientifically valid?
Log in
to add to quiz, bookmark, or report issues.