Thorndike: Trial and Error
Asked 3 months ago · Viewed 2,944 times
Under Edward Thorndike's 'Trial and Error Theory', one of the primary laws formulated is the 'Law of Effect', which states that if a satisfactory or pleasant outcome follows a response, the stimulus-response (S-R) bond is strengthened, and if an unsatisfactory or painful outcome follows, the bond is weakened. Regarding its actual psychological implications, satisfactory learning experiences in classroom teaching, reinforcement, and the scientific management of motivation, which of the following psychological statements is most authentic and scientifically valid?
✓ Correct! Well done.
✗ Not quite — the correct answer is highlighted above.
Detailed Explanation
Edward Thorndike's 'Law of Effect' is one of the primary laws of learning. It clearly establishes that satisfying consequences or rewards strengthen the S-R bond, increasing the tendency of students to repeat positive responses.
Key Implications in Classroom Teaching
- Positive Reinforcement: Teachers should create a learning environment where students receive satisfactory feedback and positive reinforcement for their successes.
- Motivation: Experiencing success enhances students' self-confidence and keeps their motivational level high.
Therefore, option (b) is the most scientifically valid statement regarding its psychological implications in education.
Next question →
Under Edward Thorndike's Trial and Error Theory of Learning, the 'Law of…
← Previous question
Under Edward Thorndike's 'Trial and Error Theory', the…
Related Questions
→
Under Edward Thorndike's 'Trial and Error Theory', the 'Law of Readiness' states that when a nervous system is ready to conduct and is allowed to do so, it is satisfied, and when it is not ready and is forced, it experiences annoyance. Regarding its actual psychological implications and scientific management of student motivation, academic readiness, and adaptation in classroom teaching, which of the following psychological statements is most authentic and scientifically valid?
→
Upon a deep analysis of the philosophical and functional nature of Thorndike's 'Connectionism', Pavlov's 'Classical Conditioning', and Skinner's 'Operant Conditioning' theories, which of the following statements most accurately explains the distinction among them regarding Stimulus-Response (S-R) and Response-Stimulus (R-S) relationships?
→
Upon a deep analysis of the philosophical and comparative dynamics of Edward Thorndike's laws of 'Connectionism', Ivan Pavlov's 'Classical Conditioning', and B.F. Skinner's 'Operant Conditioning' in the psychology of learning, if the interrelationships among these three theories are examined in the context of stimulus presentation and response control in an experiment, which of the following scientific conclusions is the most authoritative?
→
Upon an in-depth analysis of Edward Thorndike's 'Connectionism', Ivan Pavlov's 'Classical Conditioning', and B.F. Skinner's 'Operant Conditioning' in the psychology of learning, if a learner impacts the environment through voluntary actions without any predetermined mechanical stimulus, and the probability of their response increases based on the received consequences or positive reinforcement, which fundamental mechanism of learning does this demonstrate and how is it fundamentally different from Pavlov's classical conditioning?
→
Under Edward Thorndike's Connectionism Theory, one of the most crucial and central primary laws—the 'Law of Readiness'—is defined as a psychological state where, when a conduction unit is ready to conduct and is allowed to do so, it is satisfying for the learner, whereas if it is prevented, it becomes annoying and hinders learning. Regarding the actual psychological implications of this law for students' mental preparation, levels of motivation, and the scientific management of an optimal learning environment in classroom teaching, which of the following psychological statements is most authentic and scientifically valid?
→
Under Edward Thorndike's 'Trial and Error Theory of Learning', the 'Law of Readiness' is defined as a state where when a conduction unit is ready to conduct, for it to do so is satisfying, and when it is not ready, for it to conduct is annoying. Regarding its psychological implications for classroom teaching, student motivation, learning pace, and the scientific management of satisfying outcomes, which of the following psychological statements is most authentic and scientifically valid?
→
Which of the following psychological statements is most authentic and scientifically valid regarding the actual psychological implications of Edward Thorndike's 'Law of Readiness' (under the Trial and Error Theory of Learning)—which clarifies that when a neural pathway is completely ready to act, acting is satisfying, and if it is not ready, acting is painful or unsatisfactory—and its scientific management in classroom teaching regarding students' mental preparation, adaptation of motivation, and overcoming the plateau of learning?
→
According to Edward Thorndike's 'Trial and Error Theory of Learning', the 'Law of Readiness' states that when a conduction unit is ready to conduct and is allowed to do so, it is satisfying for the learner, whereas obstruction leads to annoyance. Which of the following psychological statements is most authentic and scientifically valid regarding its classroom implications for students' motivation, mental set, and learning effectiveness?
Log in
to add to quiz, bookmark, or report issues.