Thorndike: Trial and Error
Asked 3 months ago · Viewed 1,153 times
Under Edward Thorndike's 'Trial and Error Theory', one of the primary laws formulated is the 'Law of Effect', which states that if a satisfactory or pleasant outcome follows a response, the stimulus-response (S-R) bond is strengthened, and if an unsatisfactory or painful outcome follows, the bond is weakened. Regarding its actual psychological implications, satisfactory learning experiences in classroom teaching, reinforcement, and the scientific management of motivation, which of the following psychological statements is most authentic and scientifically valid?
✓ Correct! Well done.
✗ Not quite — the correct answer is highlighted above.
Detailed Explanation
Edward Thorndike's 'Law of Effect' is one of the primary laws of learning. It clearly establishes that satisfying consequences or rewards strengthen the S-R bond, increasing the tendency of students to repeat positive responses.
Key Implications in Classroom Teaching
- Positive Reinforcement: Teachers should create a learning environment where students receive satisfactory feedback and positive reinforcement for their successes.
- Motivation: Experiencing success enhances students' self-confidence and keeps their motivational level high.
Therefore, option (b) is the most scientifically valid statement regarding its psychological implications in education.
Next question →
Under Edward Thorndike's Trial and Error Theory of Learning, the 'Law of…
← Previous question
Under Edward Thorndike's 'Trial and Error Theory', the…
Related Questions
→
Which of the following is the most subtle and important theoretical distinction between Thorndike's Trial and Error Theory and Skinner's Operant Conditioning?
→
Under Edward Thorndike's 'Trial and Error Theory of Learning', one of the most crucial and central concepts is the 'Law of Effect'. This psychological law states that if a response is followed by a satisfying or pleasurable consequence, the bond between the stimulus and response (S-R Bond) is strengthened, whereas if it is followed by an unsatisfying or painful consequence, that bond is weakened. Regarding the actual psychological implications of this law and the scientific management of student motivation levels, satisfying learning experiences, and reinforcement in classroom teaching, which of the following psychological statements is most authentic and scientifically valid?
→
Under the theories of learning, a comparative and foundational analysis of Edward Thorndike's 'Trial and Error Theory', Ivan Pavlov's 'Classical Conditioning', and B.F. Skinner's 'Operant Conditioning' reveals that if a learner impacts the environment through independent or voluntary responses without waiting for any mechanical stimulus and strengthens the tendency to repeat the behavior via satisfying consequences or 'reinforcement', which fundamental mechanism of learning does this highlight, and how does it fundamentally differ from Thorndike's and Pavlov's theories?
→
Under the theories of learning, upon an in-depth analysis of Edward Thorndike's 'Trial and Error Theory' and B.F. Skinner's 'Operant Conditioning Theory', which of the following statements is most appropriate and scientifically true regarding the fundamental and functional differences between them?
→
Under Edward Thorndike's Connectionism Theory, one of the most crucial and central primary laws—the 'Law of Readiness'—is defined as a psychological state where, when a conduction unit is ready to conduct and is allowed to do so, it is satisfying for the learner, whereas if it is prevented, it becomes annoying and hinders learning. Regarding the actual psychological implications of this law for students' mental preparation, levels of motivation, and the scientific management of an optimal learning environment in classroom teaching, which of the following psychological statements is most authentic and scientifically valid?
→
Under Edward Thorndike's 'Trial and Error Theory of Learning', the 'Law of Readiness' is defined as a state where when a conduction unit is ready to conduct, for it to do so is satisfying, and when it is not ready, for it to conduct is annoying. Regarding its psychological implications for classroom teaching, student motivation, learning pace, and the scientific management of satisfying outcomes, which of the following psychological statements is most authentic and scientifically valid?
→
Which of the following psychological statements is most authentic and scientifically valid regarding the actual psychological implications of Edward Thorndike's 'Law of Readiness' (under the Trial and Error Theory of Learning)—which clarifies that when a neural pathway is completely ready to act, acting is satisfying, and if it is not ready, acting is painful or unsatisfactory—and its scientific management in classroom teaching regarding students' mental preparation, adaptation of motivation, and overcoming the plateau of learning?
→
According to Edward Thorndike's 'Trial and Error Theory of Learning', the 'Law of Readiness' states that when a conduction unit is ready to conduct and is allowed to do so, it is satisfying for the learner, whereas obstruction leads to annoyance. Which of the following psychological statements is most authentic and scientifically valid regarding its classroom implications for students' motivation, mental set, and learning effectiveness?
Log in
to add to quiz, bookmark, or report issues.