Operant Conditioning (Skinner)
Asked 3 weeks ago · Viewed 1,905 times
Under B. F. Skinner's Operant Conditioning Theory, a crucial central concept is 'Partial or Intermittent Reinforcement Schedules', defined as a learning process where reinforcement is provided intermittently at fixed or variable intervals or ratios rather than after every correct response. Regarding its actual psychological implications and scientific management of student response rates, persistence, and resistance to extinction in classroom teaching, which of the following psychological statements is most authentic and scientifically valid?
✓ Correct! Well done.
✗ Not quite — the correct answer is highlighted above.
Detailed Explanation
Detailed Explanation
According to B. F. Skinner's Operant Conditioning Theory, partial or intermittent reinforcement schedules (especially variable schedules like the variable ratio schedule) prevent learners from accurately predicting when the next reward will occur.
- Resistance to Extinction: This uncertainty and anticipation generate an extraordinarily high resistance to extinction in students.
- Long-term Persistence: Consequently, students maintain their academic efforts and desired behaviors for longer periods even without continuous external rewards.
- Comparison: While continuous reinforcement is effective for acquiring new behaviors quickly, partial reinforcement is far superior for maintaining behaviors and preventing their decline.
Therefore, Option A is the correct and scientifically validated psychological statement.
Next question →
Under B.F. Skinner's Operant Conditioning Theory, a central concept is…
← Previous question
Under B. F. Skinner's 'Operant Conditioning Theory', a…
Related Questions
→
Under the psychology of learning, while closely analyzing Edward Thorndike's 'Primary Laws of Learning' and B.F. Skinner's concept of reinforcement in 'Operant Conditioning', which specific law of Thorndike served as the direct conceptual extension and experimental refinement that later formed the basis of Skinner's 'Schedules of Reinforcement' and response-reaction dynamics?
→
When conducting an in-depth analysis of the philosophical and theoretical nature between Ivan Pavlov's 'Classical Conditioning' and B.F. Skinner's 'Operant Conditioning' in the field of learning, which of the following statements highlights the most important and fundamental difference between these two theories?
→
Upon a deep analysis of the fundamental theoretical and functional assumptions between Ivan Pavlov's 'Classical Conditioning' theory and B.F. Skinner's 'Operant Conditioning' theory, which of the following statements most accurately clarifies the distinction between them?
→
When conducting an in-depth psychological analysis of the role of 'reinforcement' and the nature of stimulus-response among Thorndike's 'Law of Effect', Pavlov's 'Classical Conditioning', and Skinner's 'Operant Conditioning' in the study of learning, which of the following statements most accurately explains the fundamental and functional differences among the three?
→
Under B. F. Skinner's Operant Conditioning Theory, a highly significant and central concept is 'Shaping', which is defined as the method of successive approximations where, instead of establishing a complex, novel, or desired behavior directly at once, the desired complex behavior or response is gradually shaped by providing reinforcement to every small and successive step moving toward the target behavior. Regarding the actual psychological implications of shaping and the scientific management of complex skill acquisition, behavior modification, and instructional design for students in the classroom, which of the following psychological statements is most authentic and scientifically valid?
→
Under B. F. Skinner's 'Operant Conditioning Theory', a very important and central concept—'Shaping'—is defined as the psychological technique of progressive reinforcement where, instead of directly producing a complex, novel, or desired behavior all at once, successive approximations moving toward the target behavior are systematically reinforced one by one until the final desired complex behavior is fully established. Regarding its real psychological implications and scientific application in classroom teaching for acquiring new student skills, building complex habits, and conducting remedial instruction, which of the following psychological statements is most authentic and scientifically valid?
→
Under B.F. Skinner's Operant Conditioning Theory, a highly significant and central concept is 'Shaping', which is defined as a successive approximation technique where, instead of instantly expecting a desired complex new behavior, the final complex behavior is shaped by step-by-step reinforcement of small incremental steps and behaviors moving toward that goal. Regarding its actual psychological implications and scientific management of complex skill acquisition, step-by-step behavior modification, and positive reinforcement management in classroom teaching, which of the following psychological statements is most authentic and scientifically valid?
→
Under B. F. Skinner's Operant Conditioning Theory, a central concept is the 'Skinner Box' or 'Operant Chamber', defined as a controlled experimental apparatus through which an organism (such as a rat or pigeon) learns to adapt to the environment and acquire complex behaviors by experiencing the effects of reinforcement or punishment resulting from its voluntary responses. Regarding its psychological implications and scientific application in classroom instruction—specifically through programmed instruction, immediate feedback, and positive behavior modification—which of the following psychological statements is most authentic and scientifically valid?
Log in
to add to quiz, bookmark, or report issues.